<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter Testing Star and Like, But Why?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://performinsider.com/2012/10/twitter-testing-star-and-like-but-why/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://performinsider.com/2012/10/twitter-testing-star-and-like-but-why/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=twitter-testing-star-and-like-but-why</link>
	<description>Where Performance Marketing Starts with Pace Lattin and Murray Newlands</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:30:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elena Anne</title>
		<link>http://performinsider.com/2012/10/twitter-testing-star-and-like-but-why/#comment-13616</link>
		<dc:creator>Elena Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 08:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performinsider.com/?p=9876#comment-13616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think that this one change would make or break Twitter, but that&#039;s just my opinion. :) If the &quot;favorite&quot; button is already so well-liked, it does seem unnecessary  - but, as you point out, there could be more to it than meets the eye. Agreed, though, that one of the things that makes Twitter stand out is the absence of &quot;liking.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that this one change would make or break Twitter, but that&#8217;s just my opinion. <img src='http://cdn1.lxmarketingllc.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  If the &#8220;favorite&#8221; button is already so well-liked, it does seem unnecessary  &#8211; but, as you point out, there could be more to it than meets the eye. Agreed, though, that one of the things that makes Twitter stand out is the absence of &#8220;liking.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erda</title>
		<link>http://performinsider.com/2012/10/twitter-testing-star-and-like-but-why/#comment-13609</link>
		<dc:creator>erda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performinsider.com/?p=9876#comment-13609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve only just started using Twitter again within the last few days after a long drought, and I&#039;m quite interested in this feature. I see a star icons followed by the word &#039;Star&#039;. I&#039;ve noticed the use of this feature seems to be more associated to tweets we &#039;agree with&#039; or &#039;like&#039;, I can see value in starring something because not everything we agree with we necessarily want to re-tweet. I like it]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve only just started using Twitter again within the last few days after a long drought, and I&#8217;m quite interested in this feature. I see a star icons followed by the word &#8216;Star&#8217;. I&#8217;ve noticed the use of this feature seems to be more associated to tweets we &#8216;agree with&#8217; or &#8216;like&#8217;, I can see value in starring something because not everything we agree with we necessarily want to re-tweet. I like it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
