Trademark Bidding to Become Illegal Again?
Home » Industry News, Specials

Trademark Bidding to Become Illegal Again?

google

Here’s some bad news out of the 4th US Circle Court of appeals: It seems that they have revived the Rosetta Stone case against Google which questioned the legality of trademark bidding.  This is a dangerous case for the industry, as it revives the debate that was supposedly settled, if companies can bid on trademark terms in Google and other PPC engines.

In 2009 Rosetta Stone, the guys who claim you can learn a foreign language on DVD in only a few short months, sued Google claiming that their trademark was being infringed when Google allowed competitors to buy trademark searches.  The case had been dismissed by the US District Court in 2010. However, the appeals court has sent it back basically claiming that the original court hadn’t properly considered the case.

“A reasonable trier of fact could find that Google intended to cause confusion in that it acted with the knowledge that confusion was very likely to result from its use of the marks,” Chief Judge William Traxler wrote for the three-judge panel.

While there has been no decision on what this means, it could mean that a court could decide that there is potential confusion issues on trademark bidding, making it illegal again. This flies in the face of the Network Automation case that was ruled in March 2011 that basically said that trademark bidding was allowed.

Written by Pace Lattin

Pace Lattin is one of the top experts in interactive advertising, affiliate marketing. Pace Lattin is known for his dedication to ethics in marketing, and focus on compliance and fraud in the industry, and has written numerous articles for publications from MediaPost, ClickZ, ADOTAS and his own blogs.

There are one comments. Join the discussion.











Share/Bookmark this!

One Comment

  • Stefan says:

    The court isn’t going to overturn its own decision no matter how many times the appeals court bounce it back. In these kinds of circumstances all that happens in that the circuit court spends time attempting to better justify its original finding rather than retrying the case. Nothing is changing here.

Leave a reply

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

CommentLuv badge

Recent Posts

Subscribe to PerformInsider

Get a FREE COPY of the Affiliate Marketing Insiders Handbook NOW! You'll also receive the free Performance Marketing Insider Newsletter and recieve weekly updates on what is going on in the affiliate and performance marketing industry. You'll learn it first at Performance Marketing Insider.

Your Email
 
Your Name



Advertise Here